|
|
||
Phoenix
College Assessment Committees
|
|||
![]() |
|
View the 2004-2005 Assessment Committee Members
Outcome
Statement: A multidisciplinary
faculty committee uses a standardized critical thinking test, the
Test of Everyday
Reasoning, to get a measure of the critical thinking abilities
of the student body. The committee will also use a locally
developed rubric to assist instructors in assessing critical thinking
in their classrooms. The committee will report its findings and make
recommendations to the campus community. Contact: Phil Pepe (285-7106, phil.pepe@pcmail.maricopa.edu)
Developmental Education Outcome
Statement: Developmental math, English, and reading instructors administer a Pre Study Skills Survey, expose students to a Study Skills Workshop, and administer a Post Study Skills Survey. Another set of instructors only administer the Pre and Post Study Skills Survey. The Developmental Education Committee looks at the study skills practices of the students to identify areas for improvement with the intent to share findings with faculty. Contact: Camilla Westenberg (285-7365, camilla.westenberg@pcmail.maricopa.edu)
Outcome
Statement:
Contact: Pam Rogers (285-7359, pamela.rogers@pcmail.maricopa.edu)
Outcome
Statement:
An information literate student recognizes when information is needed and has the ability to locate, evaluate, and use effectively the needed information. Using standards established by the Association of College and Research Libraries, a multidisciplinary faculty committee will participate in Project SAILS and will explore the use of rubrics to assess information literacy competency. Contact: Ann Roselle (285-7549, ann.roselle@pcmail.maricopa.edu)
Numeracy Outcome
Statement:
Samples of assignments in which students use math are collected throughout the year from courses in many disciplines, ranging from Art to Dental Hygiene to Nursing to Chemistry. The samples are assessed by a voluntary committee of faculty from many disciplines as demonstrating or not demonstrating each of five mathematical problem-solving competencies described by the Numeracy Rubric. The training they receive in using the Rubric enables faculty to better create problems eliciting deeper mathematical thought from students, and better teach applications of math in their fields. Contact: Kory Merkel (285-7673, kory.merkel@pcmail.maricopa.edu)
Outcome
Statement: Every occupational program Director submits yearly, (in the fall for the preceding academic year), a rubric which identifies the methods that the program is using to measure how students are being prepared for the workforce and a separate rubric which measures the professional behaviors students in the program will exhibit. It also identifies the person responsible for gathering the information as well as the identified audience and when the evaluation is conducted. Most importantly, it asks the changes made in the program as a result of the evaluation methods. Both direct and indirect methods are encouraged. Contact: Kristin Anderson (285-7324, kristin.anderson@pcmail.maricopa.edu)
Outcome
Statement: A multi-disciplinary
faculty committee gathers taped presentations from a variety of academic
and occupational courses and uses an 8-competency
rubric as a rating tool. Attempting to "close the feedback
loop" and help create a "culture" of oral presentation
instruction on campus, the committee has designed two major documents:
1) "Oral Presentation
Recommendations for Students" and 2) "Assigning
an Oral Presentation: The Whys and Hows for Faculty." Contact: Gerry Burgess (285-7302, gerald.burgess@pcmail.maricopa.edu)
Outcome
Statement: A multidisciplinary faculty committee uses a locally-developed scoring rubric to assess student writing samples from across the campus. The committee reports its findings and makes recommendations to the campus community. Contact: Edlyn
Soderman (285-7382, edlyn.soderman@pcmail.maricopa.edu)
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |