Phoenix College Home Student's Portal Portal for Faculty and Staff Portal for Alumni and Friends Portal for Employers and Partners Search
Phoenix College Home

HLC/NCA Accreditation at Phoenix College         


  

left-menu-pic

Introduction

Newsletter                    

Resources

Committee Portal

Accreditation Timeline

Criterion Committees:
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 5

 

 

 

  

Phoenix College Dental Hygiene Program

Program Goals Assessment Plan 1999-2001

Goal 1:  Provide an educational program which meets the standards of the Commission on Dental Accreditation of the American Dental Association.

 

Method

Expected

Results

When

Conducted

Responsibility for

Assessment

Audience for

Results

 

Clinical Competency Evaluation

(Objective Structured Clinical Exam)

(OSCE)

100% pass

End of each

semester

Faculty

Faculty, Administration, Advisory Comm., DDS community

 

Mock Boards/Test Cases

90% pass on first attempt

Sp. 1st yr., Fall/Spring of Senior year

Faculty

Faculty, Students

 

Employer Surveys

See Goal #5

Every 10  years

Director

Faculty, Administration, Advisory Comm.

 

Graduate Surveys

See Goal #5

Annually

Director

Faculty, Administration, Advisory Comm.

 

Patient Satisfaction Surveys

See Goal #2

ongoing

students

all faculty, admin. adv. comm..

 

See Program Competencies Assessment Plan

cont. improvement

ongoing

all faculty

advisory comm.., faculty, adm.

 

See data on Quality Assurance

cont. improvement

ongoing

committee on

quality assure.

advisory board, faculty, administration

 

ADA Commission on Dental Accreditation self study and site visit

1-2 suggestions, 1 commendation

December 2001

DH Faculty

Administration

Faculty, Administration, Students, Graduates, Advisory Comm.

 

North Central Accreditation

Improvement in College Student Outcomes Assessment Plan

Every 10 years Oct. interim report

Faculty, Administration

Faculty, Administration, Graduates, Advisory Comm.

Data and changes made as a result of the assessment process

Change in WREB criteria in 1999 resulted in change in Test Case criteria

Spring 2000-Clinical DH trial OSCE was conducted on the Senior class and resulted in additional educational experiences in caries detection on radiographs and chart entries.

Fall/Spring 2000-01 Test Case Result:  only 2 students failed test cases this year 

Fall/Spring  00-01OSCE in Junior class:  more practice needed with Initial Data Base information

Fall/Spring OSCE 00-01 in Senior class:  more practice needed with radiographic interpretation more practice with radiograph interpretation

Program Competencies Assessment Plan helped coordination of full and part time faculty and clinical lab associates and required all faculty to continually monitor the Course and Program Competencies

Excellent results on patient satisfaction surveys

Patient satisfaction survey:  students felt that data from patients was “more credible” than data from faculty 

Quality Assurance committee met 2 x’s this year and developed a plan of action for our department

Spring OSCE result:  marked improvement in radiographic interpretation


Exhibit 2a cont’d

Goal 2. Educate students who will demonstrate ethical and professional conduct with patients/clients and who will successfully complete written and clinical board examinations necessary for licensure.

Method

Expected

Results

When

Conducted

Responsibility for

Assessment

Audience for

Results

Patient Satisfaction Surveys

50% return – overall rating of “4”

Throughout the year

Clinical Faculty, Students

Faculty, Administration, Students, Advisory Comm.

Results:  National Board

Examination

100% pass rate

Summer

Director

Faculty, Administration, Students

Results:  Regional Board Examination

100% pass rate

Summer

Director

Faculty, Administration

Oral Exit Program Interview

90% positive

Annually in spring

Dental Hygiene Advisory Board Members

Faculty, Administration, Advisory comm..

Student Self Assessment

and clinic notebook

Mean evaluation 90%

Spring, 1st year;

Spring/Fall, 2nd year

Course Instructor, Clinical Faculty

Faculty, Administration, Students

Program Portfolio of Program Competencies

minimum standards

started Sp. 2001

all faculty

faculty, adv. comm.., adm.

Data and changes made as a result of the assessment process

1999-PC ranked 5th in nation in 1999 National Board Examination; 100% pass rate in Regional Board Examination

Fall 99-students were given more clear picture as to what was expected of them on their self assessment assignment

Spring 2000 As a result of the scores on the 2000 National Boards, faculty will continue to facilitate student study for National Board Exams, (ranked 47th in nation; top 24% of schools)

Sp.2001- College Program Review resulted in recommendation that the clinic receptionist salary be a Fund One salaried employee and not Fund 2 ( fund 2  results from patient fees and student lab fees)  Also recommended that an OSHA line be designated for employee infection control materials.  Acting President will follow up on these recommendations with the Dean of Instruction.

Fall and Spring 2000-01-students self assessment of their clinical abilities were more thoughtful and clear, faculty felt that this was a result of more emphasis on self assessment in school and after they graduate

Sp. 01 National Board Results:  one failed, ranked 36th in nation, top 24%. Consider adding the Board Review (elective course) to Spring 02 schedule

Sp.01- 100% pass rate on the clinical WREB board

Academic years 99-00, 00-01, excellent results on the patient sat. surveys

Faculty held first meeting with students regarding Program Portfolio, faculty teams were established with all full time faculty responsible for 6 students

As a result of the oral exit interview conducted in May of 2000 the following changes were made in the DH Program:  reduce focus group time in the Sp. semester of the senior year, in the fall, review policy for dismissal from the Program, conduct in service for part time faculty, and continue to calibrate instructors in 1st and 2nd year clinic

2001 results revealed:  strengths; students feel they received a well rounded education, good patient experiences, well prepared for boards and diagnosis and assessment in clinic is excellent; weaknesses:  too much paperwork, more prepared for expenses in the spring of the senior year, practice management class needs to be revised, and application for boards was received too late


Exhibit 2a cont’d

Goal 3:  Establish a curriculum which meets the needs of the dental community, serves the oral health needs of a culturally-diverse community, and which incorporates current dental hygiene trends and technology.

Method

Expected

Results

When

Conducted

Responsibility for

Assessment

Audience for

Results

Admissions Criteria

Maintain diverse student population at

a 20% minimum

Spring

Dental Hygiene Advisory Committee

Faculty, Administration, Dental Hygiene Advisory Board

Monitor Student race/ethnicity

Maintain diverse student population at minimum 20%

Fall

Director

Faculty, Administration, Dental Hygiene Advisory Board

Monitor number of enriching clinical experiences

Students participate in 5 service-learning activities

Fall/spring

Senior Clinic Coordinator

Faculty, Administration, Students, Dental Hygiene Advisory Board

Dental Hygiene Student Oral

Exit Interview

90% positive response on Competency #13

Spring

Director

Faculty, Administration, Students, Dental Hygiene Advisory Board

Job Placement

100% placement of all students placed

Fall

Director

Faculty, Dental Hygiene Advisory Board

Student Course Evaluations

90% positive

Completion of all courses

Director, Faculty

Faculty, Administration

Complete Curriculum Revision

Maintain dynamic curriculum plan

Summer 1999

Dental Hygiene Faculty

Faculty, Administration, Students, Dental Hygiene Advisory Board

Prevention Course Assignment

Students participate in 2 service-learning activities

Fall

Course Director

Faculty, Advisory Board

Community Oral Health

Course Assignment

Students participate in 5 service-learning activities

Spring

Course Director

Faculty, Advisory Board

Caring Hands

40-50 homeless children are provided dental hygiene care by volunteers

Spring

Students, Faculty Advisor

PC Administration, Advisory Board

Employer Survey

 

Every 5 years

Director

Faculty, Administration, Advisory Board

Grad Surveys

95% positive response

Fall

Director

Faculty, Administration,

Advisory Board

Az. Jurisprudence Exam

100% pass rate

Spring

Practice

Management

Instructor

Faculty, Ad. Board, Administration


Exhibit 2a cont’d

Goal 3, cont’d

Data and changes made as a result of the assessment process

Fall 2000 implementation of the revised curriculum with a plan in place to monitor and assess the new curriculum

Fall 2000- as a result of the growing geriatric population, 1 of the 5 service learning activities was required to be with a geriatric community based group

Fall 2000- ave GPA for incoming class was 3.97

Fall 2001- ave. GPA for incoming class was 3.9

Fall 2000-01 race and ethnicity monitoring revealed that a more diverse group of students is entering dental hygiene at PC

Sp. 2000 oral exit interview revealed that students thought they got a good education, that faculty needed more calibration, and that the faculty needed “new blood”

F/S 2000-02 course evaluations of competencies showed that the majority of students felt that they learned over 95% of the course competencies at a 4 level (a great extent) Some changes may need to be made in the Head and Neck course

Sp. 2000-01 Caring Hands Clinic was sponsored by SADHA and over $8000.00 of dentistry to 45 homeless children

F/S Enriching Clinical Experiences attended by senior DH student received very positive comments on evaluations

Fall 2000-Gaduate Surveys revealed that over 90% of the surveys returned thought that they learned what they needed for private practice

Employer Surveys revealed that employers are very satisfied with our graduates (low return rate)

No students graduating from the Program received a grade of less than C in any course

Evidence supports no major changes to be made in the Program’s curriculum at this time

100% passed J. P. exam in Practice Management


Exhibit 2a cont’d

Goal 4:  Promote professional and personal excellence among students, faculty and staff, and encourage life-long learning.

Method

Expected

Results

When

Conducted

Responsibility for

Assessment

Audience for

Results

Monitor number of faculty who maintain membership in professional organizations

All Dental Hygiene faculty members

Annually, Fall DHI and II meetings

Director

Faculty, Administration

Monitor number of students who maintain membership in professional organizations

All students

Annually, October

Director

Faculty, Administration

Monitor number of students conversion rates through ADHA report

90%

Annually, November

Director

Faculty, Administration

Monitor National and Local meetings attended by faculty

95-100% participation in local session; 90% participation in national meetings

Annually -  local dental hygiene session; Every 2 years – national session

Director

Faculty, Administration

Monitor faculty/students positions in professional organization

increase # of graduates in leadership positions

Fall

SADHA Advisor, Director

Faculty, Administration

Patient Satisfaction Surveys

90% positive

Ongoing

Faculty, Students

Faculty, Students

Chart Audits

90% positive

Ongoing

Faculty, Students

Faculty, Students

Data and changes made as a result of the assessment process

Curriculum vitae from all faculty revealed that all but 1 faculty member is a member of ADHA

All students responding to the graduate survey stated that they are a member of ADHA

3 faculty members have been Presidents of ASDHA

6 recent graduates have established leadership roles in the State Hygiene Association

National Meetings-all full time faculty have attended a National Conf. in the past year

Patient satisfaction surveys revealed that clients are very satisfied with the care that they have received in the clinic

Chart Audits by students and faculty have shown some improvement in all areas, faculty suggested more detail for perio. charting on the chart audits.

Faculty have randomly selected charts for audit at the end of every semester, in the fall, improvement was needed in many area, in the spring, improvement in all areas had been noticed

2001 classes were dismissed to allow all students and faculty to attend the ASDA annual convention

Graduates celebrating 5,10,15, 20,25 year graduation anniversaries were sent letters inviting them to participate in CHP programs and on-line courses

Class pf 2000”  17 out of 23 converted to active membership on the ADHA


Exhibit 2a cont’d

Goal 5:  Provide respectful, innovative, creative and active classroom/lab instruction through faculty who are current in advanced teaching methodologies and use of media.

Method

Expected

Results

When

Conducted

Responsibility for

Assessment

Audience for

Results

Graduate Surveys

75% return

90% positive

Annually, Fall

Director

Faculty, Administration, Dental Hygiene Advisory Board

Monitor faculty attendance at workshops and faculty development through Curriculum Vitae

1 workshop annually

Throughout the year

Director

Faculty, Administration, Students

 Faculty Evaluations

90% positive

Completion of selected courses

Course instructor

Faculty, Administration

Faculty Teaching Portfolios

All Dental Hygiene faculty create/ maintain a port-folio for reflective evaluation

Every 3 years

Director and faculty

Administration

Changes made in the program as a result of the assessment process

Faculty report their increase use of power point, the internet, and other innovative technologies

Teaching portfolios have been developed for 1 faculty member:  Karen Christen

Evaluations at the end of the year revealed that students were very happy with the interactive materials developed for the radiography, head and neck, and periodontics classes

Two full time faculty attended ADEA faculty development workshops in March 2001

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
   


      Maricopa Community Colleges Logo
   Updated: 5/24/04    Disclaimer.   Send comments about this website to webmanager.