Phoenix College Home Student's Portal Portal for Faculty and Staff Portal for Alumni and Friends Portal for Employers and Partners Search
Phoenix College Home

HLC/NCA Accreditation at Phoenix College         


  

                   

Introduction

Newsletter                    

Resources

Committee Portal

Accreditation Timeline

Criterion Committees:
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 5

 

 

 

  

The Higher Learning Commission Criteria for Accreditation and Operational Indicators

Criterion Two: Preparing for the Future

The organization’s allocations of resources and its processes for evaluation and planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its education, and respond to future challenges.

Core Component – 2A.  The organization realistically prepares for a future shaped by multiple societal and economic trends.

Examples of Evidence:

  • The organization’s planning documents reflect a sound understanding of the organization’s current capacity.
  • The organization’s planning documents demonstrate that attention is being paid to emerging factors such as technology, demographic shifts, and globalization.
  • The organization’s planning documents show careful attention to the organization’s function in a multicultural society.
  • The organization’s planning processes include effective environmental scanning.
  • The organizational environment is supportive of innovation and change.
  • The organization incorporates in its planning those aspects of its history and heritage that it wishes to preserve and continue.
  • The organization clearly identifies authority for decision making about organizational goals.

 

Core Component – 2B.  The organization’s resource base supports it educational programs and its plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future.

Examples of Evidence:

  • The organization’s resources are adequate for achievement of the educational quality it claims to provide.
  • Plans for resource development and allocation document an organizational commitment to supporting and strengthening the quality of the education it provides.
  • The organization uses its human resources effectively.
  • The organization intentionally develops its human resources to meet future changes.
  • The organization’s history of financial resource development and investment documents a forward-looking concern for ensuring educational quality (e.g. investments in faculty development, technology, learning support services, new or renovated facilities.
  • The organization’s planning processes are flexible enough to respond to unanticipated needs for program reallocation, downsizing, or growth.
  • The organization has a history of achieving its planning goals.

 

Core Component – 2C. The organization’s ongoing evaluation and assessment processes provide reliable evidence of institutional effectiveness that clearly informs strategies for continuous improvement.

Examples of Evidence:

  • The organization demonstrates that its evaluation processes provide evidence that its performance meets its stated expectations for institutional effectiveness.
  • The organization maintains effective systems for collecting, analyzing, and using organizational information.
  • Appropriate data and feedback loops are available and used throughout the organization to support continuous improvement.
  • Periodic reviews of academic and administrative subunits contribute to improvement of the organization.
  • The organization provides adequate support for its evaluation and assessment processes.

 

Core Component – 2D. All levels of planning align with the organization’s mission, thereby enhancing its capacity to fulfill that mission.

Examples of Evidence:

  • Coordinated planning processes center on the mission documents that define vision, values, goals, and strategic priorities for the organization.
  • Planning processes link with budgeting processes.
  • Implementation of the organization’s planning is evident in its operation.
  • Long-range strategic planning processes allow for reprioritizing of goals when necessary because of changing environments.  
  • Planning documents give evidence of the organization’s awareness of the relationships among educational quality, student learning, and the diverse, complex, global, and technological world in which the organization and its students exist.
  • Planning processes involve internal constituents and, where appropriate, external constituents.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
   


      Maricopa Community Colleges Logo
   Updated: 3/28/05    Disclaimer.   Send comments about this website to webmanager.